| |
Temporary Discomfort:
the photos of Jules Spinatsch
essay by Martin Jaeggi
Back in the age of the cold war, when the world still
seemed simple and politics were an apocalyptic fight of good versus evil,
photographers who wanted to show historical reality often understood themselves
as heroic enlighteners in the service of humanism and considered their
camera a weapon in the fight at the front. Their images showed grave statesmen,
rugged freedom fighters, callous mass murderers, powerless victims, silently
suffering masses — straightforward and memorable images, political
icons that provoked horror or admiration, inciting the viewer to take
sides and to act.
Since the end of the cold war, however, the world has become more complex
and entangled. Politics and its images no longer offer a distinct and
clear-cut overview like they used to. Politicians know about the power
of images and manipulate them cleverly or try to suppress them, knowing
that an unfavorable image may sway public opinion.
Photographers have become cameramen for cleverly staged events, and politics
have turned into a war of images. Political and economic developments,
on the other hand, no longer follow simple formulas; ideological master
narratives and their handy visual cliches no longer seem convincing. Spellbound
and often helpless we follow political and economic developments as if
they were unpredictable natural catastrophes, vaguely explaining them
as effects of "globalization" without really knowing what this
means nor what it will bring about in the future.
But how can a photographer show historical reality under these increasingly
difficult circumstances? Jules Spinatsch's work Temporary Discomfort gives
one possible answer. Since the WTO summit in Seattle in 1999, a colorfully
diverse alliance of anti-globalization activists has organized demonstrations
at summits of the WTO, the IMF, and the WEF, that ended up in riots with
an almost ritual certainty.
The media images of these conferences and riots are familiar and predictable.
They continue the iconography of protest that has evolved since the Vietnam
war and the civil unrest of the late 60s, or they show the staple imagery
of statesmanship that has remained the same ever since the inter-war period
and the end of WW II. We merely get to see washed-out copies of images
we're always and already familiar with, stimuli for Pavlovian dogs.
Jules Spinatsch's photographs also talk about these events. But instead
of street fighting and handshakes, he shows winter nights in Davos, complete
with floodlighted barbed-wire labyrinths.He shows Genova, a fortress empty
as the Mediterranean noonday sky. We see freight containers, symbols for
world trade, that are used as barricades against its foes. He invites
us to scrutinize the streets in New York at night: road blocks, tents,
and mobile transmission units: that seem surreally empty. He photographs
the sleepy waking of the security guards. Spinatsch examines the waiting
for the big event that appears as meticulously planned, down to the last
detail.
Whatever will happen, is already inscribed in its security architecture.
The choreography of power and resistance is laid out right from the beginning.
It's a titillating and violent ritualistic clash, a bullfight for the
age of CNN: intense, emotional, and almost completely predictable. The
images that we will see tomorrow have already been determined today. Security
measures in the age of total media are not least devices to create or
prevent images as the image has become a hazard in the manipulation of
public opinion.
Jules Spinatsch creates landscapes that could serve as the antithesis
to Romantic tradition of this genre. He shows landscapes and citiscapes
as they appear under cold, strategic gaze of security planners —
a terrain where every movement must be controlled and contained. Instead
of mountaintops glowing in the evening sun and the romance of the asphalt
jungle, we see blocked inroads and cut-off escape routes, a world that
could only be described in military prose. Spinatsch mimicries the gaze
of power, power as a gaze that sees the world only as a security hazard
to be contained. At the heart of the security architecture that Spinatsch
shows us, we find a hermetically sealed vacuum in which politicians and
managers meet to organize world trade in the name of liberal democracy,
while they smile at TV cameras, remote and untouchable. The mobile transmission
units in the photographs remind us that the citizen, the citoyen, has
become a television viewer, and that the agora has evaporated in virtual
flickering.
Spinatsch's images are a subdued manifesto against the tradition of heroic
photojournalism that I mentioned in the beginning. Spinatsch does not
want to be hero. He rather is a spy behind the enemy lines. He cunningly
combines the condensed and motionless photographs with video images as
if to remind us with this contrast that, after all, he shows us images,
but that there is a reality behind the images that the viewer has to piece
together.
Spinatsch's anti-heroic stance also colors his other work. But maybe only
a clever anti-strategist can show the cold and imperious glance of power
so clearly and hauntingly.
Text © 2004 Martin
Jaeggi. Photos © 2001-2003 Jules
Spinatsch.
|